The dating gaime Adult cams portugal
Much of the controversy between evolutionists and creationists concerns the age of the earth and its fossils.At the time Darwin’s On the Origin of Species was published, the earth was “scientifically” determined to be 100 million years old. In 1947, geologists firmly established that the earth was 3.4 billion years old.This is an outrageous case of circular reasoning, and geologists are well aware of the problem. The geologist has never bothered to think of a good reply, feeling the explanations are not worth the trouble as long as the work brings results (American Journal of Science 2).Most people are surprised to learn that there is, in fact, no way to directly determine the age of any fossil or rock. For over 100 years, geologists have attempted to devise methods for determining the age of the earth that would be consistent with evolutionary dogma. Evolution, depending as it does on pure chance, requires an immense amount of time to stumble upon anything remotely approaching the integrated complexity we see in even the simplest living things.
Of one thing you may be sure: whenever “absolute” radiometric dates are in substantial disagreement with evolutionary assumptions about the age of associated fossils, the fossils always prevail.As we will see, selected data and unprovable assumptions are a problem with all methods for determining the age of the earth, as well as for dating its fossils and rocks.It has all become something of a “dating game” in which only the evolutionarily correct are allowed to play.Second, because of the short half-life of C, the radiocarbon method can only date specimens up to about 50,000 years of age.Essentially nothing of evolutionary significance is believed to have occurred in this “short” time frame.